ArticleApplied spectroscopy2025
Quantification of Protein Secondary Structures from Discrete Frequency Infrared Images Using Machine Learning.
Article in Applied spectroscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Disordered to Ordered: Nanoscale Spectroscopy Reveals Structural Evolution of Amyloid Beta 40 Fibrils.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Discrete frequency infrared (IR) imaging is an exciting experimental technique that has shown promise in various applications in biomedical science. This technique often involves acquiring IR absorptive images at specific frequencies of interest that enable pathologically relevant chemical contrast. However, certain applications, such as tracking the spatial variations in protein secondary structure of tissue specimens, necessary for the characterization of neurodegenerative diseases, require deeper analysis of spectral data. In such cases, the conventional analytical approach involves band fitting the hyperspectral data to extract the relative populations of different structures through their fitted areas under the curve (AUC). While Gaussian spectral fitting for one spectrum is viable, expanding that to an image with millions of pixels, as often applicable for tissue specimens, becomes a computationally expensive process. Alternatives like principal component analysis (PCA) are less structurally interpretable and incompatible with sparsely sampled data. Furthermore, this detracts from the key advantages of discrete frequency imaging by necessitating the acquisition of more finely sampled spectral data that is optimal for curve fitting, resulting in significantly longer data acquisition times, larger datasets, and additional computational overhead. In this work, we demonstrate that a simple two-step regressive neural network model can be utilized to mitigate these challenges and employ discrete frequency imaging for retrieving the results from band fitting without significant loss of fidelity. Our model reduces the data acquisition time nearly six-fold by requiring only seven wavenumbers to accurately interpolate spectral information at a higher resolution and subsequently using the upscaled spectra to accurately predict the component AUCs, which is more than 3000 times faster than spectral fitting. Our approach thus drastically cuts down the data acquisition and analysis time and predicts key differences in protein structure that can be vital towards broadening potential applications of discrete frequency imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.