Observational studyThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2025
Prospective Validation of ATA Risk Score for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: An ITCO Real-World Study.
Observational study in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04031339 (Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study of Clinical Outcomes of Thyroid Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study of Clinical Outcomes of Thyroid Cancer
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic performance and generalizability of a clinical-ultrasound radiomics model for predicting extrathyroidal extension in thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Internal validation of a residual thyroid recurrence model after PTC.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of Arterial Enhancement Fraction Derived from Dual-Layer Spectral Computed Tomography for Thyroid Microcarcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
62 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextThe risk of recurrence of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) smaller than 1 cm (microPTC) is low. Predictors of disease persistence in microPTC are still unclear.
objectiveTo compare the clinical and pathological characteristics of microPTCs with macrocarcinomas (PTC > 1 cm), identifying the predictors of biochemical and structural incomplete response 1 year after initial treatment in microPTC.
methodsWe included patients consecutively enrolled in the Italian Thyroid Cancer Observatory (NCT04031339), and selected patients with a histological diagnosis of PTC for whom complete pathological, clinical, treatment information, and results at the 1-year follow-up visits were available.
resultsAmong 5038 patients in the cohort, 2345 (46.5%) had a microPTC. Patients with microPTCs had tumors with more indolent pathological features: only 3% of patients were classified as high risk according to the American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk stratification system for persistent or recurrent disease and 1% had distant metastases at diagnosis. MicroPTCs had a significantly better outcome: only 5% had a biochemical response and 2.3% a structural incomplete (SIR) response. Distant metastases at diagnosis were the best predictor of SIR in microPTCs (OR 5.13, 95% CI 1.11-23.73, P = .04). In a subgroup of 925 patients treated by total thyroidectomy and radioiodine treatment, the best predictor of SIR was the ATA high risk (OR 5.47, 95% CI 1.42-21.04, P = .01).
conclusionOur study confirms the favorable initial outcome of microPTC in a large series. We demonstrate that the ATA risk classification is reliable in predicting biochemical and structural persistence in patients with microPTC. Distant metastases, although rare, remain the best predictor of structural persistence at 1-year follow-up. These findings underscore the importance of tailored management strategies based on comprehensive risk stratification, rather than solely on tumor size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.