ReviewNutrition & metabolism2025
Effect of rye consumption on markers of glycemic control: evidence on the "rye factor": a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Nutrition & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rye (Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rye, as a source of dietary fiber, may have beneficial effects in glycemic control. In the current meta-analysis, we collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the effect of rye consumption on glucose and insulin markers. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched to find the RCTs. Random-effects model was used to calculate mean difference and 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-one RCTs, including 922 participants, passed the screening and eligibility stages and were included in the meta-analysis. Rye consumption did not have a significant effect on glucose indices including fasting, postprandial, and area under the curve (AUC). Subgroup analysis did not make a difference in the results, except that there was trends for increased postprandial glucose in two subgroups: individuals aged > 50 y (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.93, 95% CI: -0.03, 1.90 mmol/l, P = 0.058) and short intervention lengths (≤ 270 min) (WMD = 0.48, 95% CI: -0.03, 0.99 mmol/l, P = 0.066), and a trend for decreased AUC for glucose in rye fiber doses ≥ 12 g (WMD = -0.22, 95% CI: -0.46, 0.01 mmol/l, P = 0.059). Rye consumption did not show an effect on fasting and postprandial insulin but indicated a reduction in AUC for insulin (WMD = -0.48, 95% CI: -0.66, -0.30 mU/l, P < 0.001). Overall, results of this meta-analysis suggest that rye consumption may reduce insulin postprandial AUC without affecting glucose markers. Prospective cohorts are needed to determine the clinical importance of the finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.