Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165306›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Development and evaluation of a school-based bullying prevention program (Bullying&You): study protocol for a cluster randomized trial.

Vanessa Jantzer, Franziska Neumayer, Stefan Lerch, Michael Kaess

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vanessa JantzerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Blumenstrasse 8, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Franziska NeumayerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Blumenstrasse 8, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan LerchUniversity Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Stöckli, Bolligenstrasse 111, 3000, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael KaessDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Blumenstrasse 8, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany. Michael.Kaess@upd.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0031-7764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBullying victimization affects one in ten schoolchildren in Europe and has far-reaching negative consequences for mental health and school achievement. Although school-based bullying prevention programs seem overall capable of reducing the frequency of bullying, the continuous development, improvement, and rigorous evaluation of bullying prevention programs with enhanced feasibility and efficacy is critical. Consequently, we developed the program Bullying&You, which applies a blended-intervention approach to school-based bullying prevention based on latest empirical knowledge regarding effective program components and program-related facilitators. We aim to test its efficacy within a cluster randomized trial (CRT).

methodsBullying&You will be implemented and evaluated in 40 schools (estimated total n = 8500 pupils) in Germany. The effectiveness of the program will be investigated in a CRT comparing 20 schools in the intervention group (IG; starting immediately with the program) with 20 schools in the waiting control group (CG; starting with a 1-year delay). The target group of the program are pupils in grades 3-9, as well as the whole school staff. All pupils will be asked to complete questionnaires concerning their bullying experiences (as victims, perpetrators, and bystanders) and mental health at baseline (T0) and two annual follow-ups (T1 and T2). The main endpoint of the trial is the reduction of bullying (prevalence of victims and perpetrators of direct, indirect, and cyberbullying) at 1-year follow-up (T1) in the IG compared to the CG. Secondary endpoints are psychopathology and self-harm behaviour. In addition, further research questions include (a) which specific components of the program prove to be most effective and (b) whether there are certain characteristics that predict program success at the individual level. DISCUSSION: School-based bullying prevention programs still lack rigorous evidence for their efficacy. In addition, dissemination of bullying prevention programs has previously been hampered by the high need of resources required from schools for their implementation. The program's blended-intervention approach allows for a time-efficient and flexible implementation, while the continuous monitoring of the progress ensures program fidelity and strengthens adherence. If proven effective, Bullying&You has the potential to contribute to filling the gap in systematic dissemination of bullying prevention among youth.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00028183. Registered on 02 March 2022.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorBullyingChild BehaviorCrime VictimsSchool Health ServicesStudentsAdolescentChildFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMental HealthMulticenter Studies as TopicProgram EvaluationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdolescentsBullyingCluster randomized trialMental healthPreventionSchool

Identifiers

PMID40165306
PMCPMC11956421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.