SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Virtual and augmented reality for anxiety reduction in orthopedic patients and providers: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metaverse and Immersive Technologies: Redefining the Future of Healthcare: A Scoping Review.International journal of preventive medicine · 2026Review
- Perioperative Ketamine and Esketamine for Postoperative Mood Symptoms After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2026Review
- Reasons for refusing high tibial osteotomy and the impact of virtual reality-based patient education: a prospective single-centre study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Enhancing lower-limb rehabilitation: a scoping review of augmented reality environment.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnxiety impacts patients and healthcare providers during orthopedic procedures, yet virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) effectiveness remains inconsistently reported, lacking systematic synthesis in this setting. This review addresses this gap.
methodsPer PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42024553394), we searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase in March 2024 for studies on VR/AR/mixed reality (MR) interventions for anxiety in orthopedic procedures. Data were narratively synthesized; bias assessed via RoB-2 and ROBINS-I.
resultsTwenty-four studies (16 RCTs, 8 cohort, n = 1714) showed VR (22 studies) and AR (2 studies) significantly reduced anxiety across procedure phases, notably in pediatrics. Healthcare providers (HCPs) reported lower anxiety and higher confidence with VR. Satisfaction rose, anesthetic use dropped, though inconsistent tools and methods limited comparisons.
conclusionVR/AR reduce pediatric anxiety in orthopedics, with less conclusive adult/HCP benefits. Clinicians could adopt preoperative VR. Research needs standardized tools and adult-focused RCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.