ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025
Research metrics of Australian eating disorders researchers.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Building the research capacity and capability of Australia's eating disorder (ED) research workforce has been identified as a key strategy to respond to the increasing prevalence of EDs. However, there is currently a limited understanding of the research strengths and scope of this workforce and this is a barrier to capacity building efforts and to evaluating the impacts of these efforts. This study sought to understand and summarise the current research metrics of the top 50 research experts in Australia identified through Expertscape. Publicly available publication, citation and funded research grants metrics, were extracted from Expertscape, Scopus, SciVal, Dimensions.ai and researcher profiles and summarised. The results indicate that Australian Feeding and Eating Disorder (FED) researchers are competitive internationally, and are spread across professional disciplines with the highest representation from psychology. Expertscape researcher rank was associated with higher numbers of publications in feeding and eating disorders overall, but not to total outputs, field-weighted citation impact (FWCI), or number of publications in top percentile journals. Publications were heavily focused on Anorexia Nervosa. Public grants awarded to the identified ED researchers in Australia over the past 10 years were largely National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project grant schemes, targeting innovative and creative research across any area of health and medical research. Cumulative dollars awarded over the 10-year period up to 2023 were approximately $23.9 million AUD, roughly 6 times less than that awarded to Schizophrenia research. These results summarise the current state of Australian FED research, comprised of a productive high performing research workforce limited by inadequate research funding.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.