ArticleBMC nursing2025
Factors influencing the self-rationing of nursing care in palliative care settings.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe rationing of nursing care is a significant concern in palliative care settings, where resource limitations can prevent nurses from providing comprehensive patient care. This study aims to examine the factors influencing the rationing of nursing care among palliative care nurses, focusing on the impact of psychological factors and workplace characteristics.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care (PIRNCA) questionnaire among 104 nurses working in palliative care. Data on anxiety and depression levels were collected using the HADS scale. Multivariate regression analysis was employed to identify key predictors of care rationing, including depression, anxiety, and type of care setting.
resultsThe average PIRNCA score was 0.82 (SD = 0.53), indicating that care rationing occurs "rarely." The most frequently rationed tasks were emotional and psychological support, patient education, and assistance with mobility. Nurses with higher depression (p = 0.002) and anxiety levels (p = 0.0012) were more likely to ration care. Working in a home-based hospice was associated with increased care rationing (p = 0.0012), while working in a palliative care ward reduced it (p = 0.0027).
conclusionsPsychological distress, particularly depression and anxiety, significantly contributes to nursing care rationing in palliative care. Additionally, the type of care setting plays a critical role, with home-based hospice care being more prone to rationing. Interventions to support nurses' mental health and optimize resource allocation, particularly in home-based care, are essential to ensure comprehensive patient care in palliative settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.