ArticleBMC medical education2025
Assessing clinical associate students' views on learning opportunities and involvement during primary health care placements: a mixed methods study in Tshwane.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Future doctors, future scholars: factors influencing China-educated international medical students' career intentions in primary care and academic medicine.Human resources for health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe training model for Clinical Associates (Clin-As), initially centered on district hospitals, has increasingly involved primary healthcare (PHC) facilities over the past few years. This study explore and compare the perceptions and experiences of Clin-A students regarding learning opportunities and involvement during hospital and clinic rotations. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional mixed-methods study involved two primary data collection techniques: the administration of the validated medical education instructional questionnaire (MedIQ) questionnaire and the facilitation of focus group discussions.
resultsA total of 74 Clin-A students participated in the quantitative study, including 20 s-year students from 2022, 35 s-year students from 2023, and 19 third-year students from 2023. The only statistically significant difference was noted in follow-up care, where student involvement was significantly higher in clinics (M = 3.39) compared to hospitals (M = 2.96), with a t-value of 2.933 (p = 0.002). For learning opportunities, the highest mean difference was observed in 'participation in patient education', where clinics (M = 4.38) had a higher mean than hospitals (M = 3.96), but without statistically significance (t = 1.715, p = 0.089). Students perceived better learning diversity and proficiency development in clinics (M: 3.91, SD: 1.31; M: 4.18, SD: 1.203) compared to hospitals (M: 4.00, SD: 1.489; M: 3.97, SD: 1.385). Clinics generally outscored hospitals, especially in involvement in patient education, chronic illness, and procedures. Ten students attended two focus group discussion: one with 2023 third-years (n = 5) and one with 2023 s-years (n = 5). Students valued clinics for skill development and patient journey exposure but faced challenges such as feeling like employees, disrupted learning from frequent rotations, patient overcrowding, and poor communication between the program and healthcare staff.
conclusionThis study underscores the importance of primary healthcare settings in Clin-A training, demonstrating that clinics provide learning opportunities and involvement in patient care comparable to hospitals. To address challenges such as high workload areas where students feel like employees, insufficient teaching, lack of staff awareness, limited learning in low-volume clinics, and disrupted rotations requires, structured rotations, enhanced preceptor training, and improved communication between programs and clinical sites are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.