Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165191›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

Healthcare resource allocation and patient choice: evidence from rural China.

Shaoyang Zhao, Yueqin Wang, Yuxiao Chen, Mei Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shaoyang ZhaoSchool of Economics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yueqin WangSchool of Economics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuxiao ChenSchool of Politics and Public Administration, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Mei ZhouSchool of Public Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. zhoumei_zm@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to quality essential healthcare services is a fundamental right for all residents. However, the unequal allocation of healthcare resources affects patients' accessibility to care, thereby influencing their healthcare choices. Utilizing health insurance administrative data and employing a difference-in-differences (DID) model, this study examines the impact of China's healthcare resource allocation reform on patients' healthcare choices. The findings reveal that increased investment in rural healthcare resources significantly reduces the proportion of residents seeking medical services outside their counties, alleviates patients' medical burden, and enhances healthcare quality. Notably, these improvements primarily benefit patients with common diseases, while the impact on those with rare diseases remains less pronounced. These results underscore the importance of strengthening the comprehensive capabilities of county-level hospitals and prioritizing high-quality resource allocation in rural areas as key directions for future reforms in healthcare system.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorHealth Care RationingHealth Services AccessibilityPatient PreferenceResource AllocationRural Health ServicesRural PopulationAdultChinaFemaleHealth Care ReformHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Health CareHealthcare burdenHealthcare qualityHealthcare resource allocationPatient choice

Identifiers

PMID40165191
PMCPMC11959753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.