Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165179›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

Gatekeeper training for suicide prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Hui Liu, Chaohui Zheng, Yu Cao, Fanyan Zeng, Huiting Chen, Wei Gao

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Suicide among patients with cancer: a retrospective study of medical treatment-related factors associated with suicide.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Chaohui ZhengThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Yu CaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Fanyan ZengDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Huiting ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Wei GaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China. wei.gao@ncu.edu.cn.

Funding

Postgraduate Innovation Special Fund of Jiangxi Province YC2023-S181Senior Talent Startup Fund of Nanchang University 28170120/9167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGatekeeper training (GKT) aims to enhance suicide gatekeepers' (GKs) abilities in assessing suicide risk, identify those at-risk and refer them. However, existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on GKT have not produced definitive results. This study reviewed RCTs on GKT to provide evidence for developing effective suicide prevention strategies.

methodsWe conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, Medrxiv, and Ebsco for English-language RCTs published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2024. Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed by using I

resultsSixteen studies were included. Compared to the control group, gatekeepers showed increased suicide knowledge (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.32 - 1.13) and enhanced self-efficacy (SMD = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.33 - 1.13) for suicide prevention. For knowledge, the improvements were sustained in the short-term (SMD = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.22 - 1.06) but diminished in the long-term (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.05 - 0.45). Online interventions showed a significant improvement in self-efficacy (SMD = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.73 - 1.32), while offline interventions demonstrated a potential but non-significant improvement (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI: -0.08 - 1.17). Preparedness also showed a significant improvement (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.31 - 1.07).

conclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrated GKT's effectiveness in enhancing knowledge and self-efficacy (moderate effect) for suicide prevention. However, the positive effects tend to decrease over time. Online training offers significant benefits, making it a viable option for widespread implementation. Additionally, the selection of gatekeepers plays a crucial role in ensuring the effectiveness of online GKT programs.

Indexed as

GatekeepingSuicide PreventionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGatekeeper trainingMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trialsSuicide preventionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40165179
PMCPMC11956478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.