ArticleBMC nursing2025
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the quality of nursing care scale among hospital nurses: a bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling analysis.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNurses play an indispensable role in healthcare teams. The quality of nursing care reflects nurses' ability to integrate care and their overall performance in patient care, making it a core objective of clinical nursing. The Chinese version of the Quality of Nursing Care (QNC) scale is a multidimensional assessment tool used for self-evaluation of nursing care quality and holds significant importance in clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the QNC scale among nurses.
methodsThis was an observational, cross-sectional, methodological study conducted at three hospitals in southern Taiwan. The 25-item Chinese version of the QNC scale was employed in the study. Data were collected from 944 nurses (response rate: 65.42%) through an online survey conducted between July and August 2022. The factor structure of the QNC scale was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (unidimensional, independent cluster model, higher-order, and bifactor) and first-order, higher-order, and bifactor ESEM. Model comparisons were conducted to determine the best-fitting factor structure.
resultsThe bifactor ESEM provided the best fit for the QNC scale, consisting of a general QNC factor and seven specific factors: patient satisfaction, health promotion, complication prevention, well-being and self-care, functional readaptation, nursing care organization, and responsibility and rigor. Some items exhibited significant cross-loadings, highlighting the model's ability to capture the multidimensional nature of nursing care quality.
conclusionsThe bifactor ESEM model demonstrated the best model fit for the Chinese version of the QNC scale, offering a reliable and interpretable representation of the multidimensional nature of nursing care. The validated scale provides a valuable tool for assessing nursing care quality in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.