ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Leveraging large language models to mimic domain expert labeling in unstructured text-based electronic healthcare records in non-english languages.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Language-Model Reasoning Enables Automated Labeling of Lung Cancer Recurrence from Unstructured Clinical Records.Research square · 2026Article
- Large Language Models Using Clinical Text in Pediatrics: A Scoping Review.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Hybrid rule-based and on-premises LLM pipeline for extracting CMR and CPET metrics from free-text reports in repaired tetralogy of Fallot.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Large language models in emergency and critical care medicine: a comprehensive review of applications, challenges, and future directions.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Large language models versus classical machine learning performance in COVID-19 mortality prediction using high-dimensional tabular data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automated Evaluation of Reflection and Feedback Quality in Workplace-Based Assessments by Using Natural Language Processing: Cross-Sectional Competency-Based Medical Education Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Powered Smart Healthcare Systems in the Era of Big Data: Applications, Diagnostic Insights, Challenges, and Ethical Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Optimized BERT-based NLP outperforms zero-shot methods for automated symptom detection in clinical practice.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe integration of big data and artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, particularly through the analysis of electronic health records (EHR), presents significant opportunities for improving diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. However, the challenge of processing and accurately labeling vast amounts of unstructured data remains a critical bottleneck, necessitating efficient and reliable solutions. This study investigates the ability of domain specific, fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) to classify unstructured EHR texts with typographical errors through named entity recognition tasks, aiming to improve the efficiency and reliability of supervised learning AI models in healthcare.
methodsTurkish clinical notes from pediatric emergency room admissions at Hacettepe University İhsan Doğramacı Children's Hospital from 2018 to 2023 were analyzed. The data were preprocessed with open source Python libraries and categorized using a pretrained GPT-3 model, "text-davinci-003," before and after fine-tuning with domain-specific data on respiratory tract infections (RTI). The model's predictions were compared against ground truth labels established by pediatric specialists.
resultsOut of 24,229 patient records classified as poorly labeled, 18,879 were identified without typographical errors and confirmed for RTI through filtering methods. The fine-tuned model achieved a 99.88% accuracy, significantly outperforming the pretrained model's 78.54% accuracy in identifying RTI cases among the remaining records. The fine-tuned model demonstrated superior performance metrics across all evaluated aspects compared to the pretrained model.
conclusionsFine-tuned LLMs can categorize unstructured EHR data with high accuracy, closely approximating the performance of domain experts. This approach significantly reduces the time and costs associated with manual data labeling, demonstrating the potential to streamline the processing of large-scale healthcare data for AI applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.