ArticleBMC primary care2025
Translation, adaptation, and validation of Person-Centered Primary Care Measures for patients in family doctor contract services within mainland China.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient-reported experiences and patient-reported experience measures in primary care, home care, and community settings. A scoping review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Correction: Translation, adaptation, and validation of person-centered primary care measures for patients in family doctor contract services within Mainland China.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Digital technology empowers model innovation in chronic disease management in Chinese grassroots communities.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the context of China's health reforms aimed at strengthening primary care through the Family Doctor Contract Service Program, effectively measuring its functional features is paramount. This study seeks to translate, adapt, and validate the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure (PCPCM) for primary care patients enrolled in family doctor contract services in mainland China.
methodsFollowing the guidelines by Sousa and Rojjanasrirat, we translated and adapted the PCPCM into Simplified Chinese and evaluated its psychometric properties. A total of 583 patients enrolled in family doctor contract services from 10 primary care facilities in Shanghai, China, participated in the study. We assessed the structural validity, internal consistency, stability reliability, and criterion validity of the PCPCM-Simplified Chinese version in accordance with the practical guidelines developed by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative and the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) initiative.
resultsThe study led to the development of the PCPCM-Simplified Chinese version tailored for patients receiving family doctor contract services (PCPCM-SC-FDCS), specifically designed to address the needs of populations most closely aligned with the concept of "primary care patients" in mainland China. Initial pilot testing prompted refinements to enhance clarity and applicability, particularly for Item 5 (Relationship). Analyses of the refined PCPCM-SC-FDCS, based on a three-point Likert scale, revealed that structural validity, internal consistency, and criterion validity all met the criteria for good measurement properties outlined in the relevant guidelines. However, for test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the first and second surveys was 0.58, which fell short of the recommended threshold of ≥ 0.70.
conclusionsThe PCPCM-SC-FDCS demonstrates satisfactory reliability and strong feasibility as a tool for evaluating the functional features of primary care among Family Doctor Contract Service Program patients in mainland China. Although further testing and refinement are necessary, this instrument offers a feasible and straightforward approach to evaluating service quality, supporting family doctor teams in enhancing primary care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.