Observational studyJournal of paediatrics and child health2025
Paediatric Emergency Department Mental Health and Behavioural Presentations in Australia Before and After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caregiver and Care Recipient Perspectives on Paediatric ED Mental Health Presentations: A Qualitative Study.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of Referral Concerns for Autism Spectrum Disorder and Global Developmental Delay: A Retrospective Audit of a Tertiary Paediatric Developmental Service.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2026Article
- Service Urgency for Children and Youth: The Development of an Algorithm to Identify Urgent and Emergent Service Users in Children's Mental Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAlthough child and adolescent mental health and behavioural presentations to hospital emergency departments (EDs) increased during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020 and 2021), little is known about the characteristics of these presentations. We aimed to compare demographic, clinical and psychosocial profiles of paediatric presentations to Australian EDs before and after the onset of the pandemic.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of 100 randomly sampled presentations by children (6-11-year-olds) and adolescents (12-17-year-olds) to 10 Australian EDs between 1 January and 31 December 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and 1 January and 31 December 2021 (COVID-19). Using a multilevel factor model, we compared the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 cohorts regarding demographic characteristics, diagnoses, precipitants, time-to-treatment, length of stay, and discharge disposition.
resultsThe COVID-19 period was characterised by increased presentations by adolescents and girls. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 cohort, the COVID-19 cohort experienced increased median waiting times (48 and 72 min, respectively), median length of ED stay (4.7 and 5.4 h), and likelihood of admissions to the ED short stay unit (9.5% and 12.9%). Patients in the COVID-19 cohort were more likely to present with self-harm and suicidal thoughts/behaviours, eating disorders, neurodevelopmental and neurocognitive disorders, and psychosocial stressors, and less likely to have diagnoses of disruptive behaviour, impulse control, and conduct disorders.
conclusionsYoung people presenting to the ED in 2021 for mental health reasons were more likely to wait longer, stay longer, have a diagnosis of intentional self-harm and/or a neurodevelopmental disorder, and report psychosocial stressors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.