SynthesisActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025
The effect of exercise in patients with lower limb lymphedema: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effect of exercise on the development of cancer-related lymphedema.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of physical therapy for lower limb lymphedema in gynecological cancer survivors: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Best Evidence for the Exercise-Based Management of Lower Limb Lymphedema After Gynecological Cancer: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of isometric muscle training combined with manual lymphatic drainage on secondary lower extremity lymphedema following gynecologic cancer surgery.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo summarize the evidence of the immediate and long-term effect of exercise interventions in patients with either primary or secondary lower limb lymphedema (LLL) on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), physical function, self-reported symptoms, lower limb volume, and adverse events.
designSystematic review following the guidelines from the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and clinicaltrials.gov. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Prospective exercise trials investigating exercise interventions as a single- or multicomponent programme in patients with LLL including assessment of at least one of the following outcomes: HR-QOL, self-reported LLL symptoms (heaviness, tension, and pain), physical function, or lower limb volume. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), single-group studies, and cross-over trials were eligible. Trials with participants at risk of LLL or a diagnosis of filariasis or lipedema were excluded.
resultsTwelve studies were included: three RCTs, five single-group studies, and four cross-over trials with a total of three hundred and sixty-seven participants. In patients with LLL, irrespective of severity, exercise seemed to have small but positive effects on HR-QOL, physical function, pain, and lower limb volume. Quality assessment showed high risk of bias. Large heterogeneity in participants, interventions, and outcome measures hinders performing of meta-analyses.
interpretationBased on a small number of studies with large clinical heterogeneity, poor methodological quality, hence low level of certainty of evidence, it was not possible to provide evidence-based recommendations on exercise for patients with LLL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.