Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40164992›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025

From Solo to Collaborative: The Global Increase in Neuroscience Authors Over Two Decades.

Mariella Segreti, Ann Paul, Pierpaolo Pani, Aldo Genovesio, Emiliano Brunamonti

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariella SegretiDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-5409-7409
Ann PaulDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7433-2022
Pierpaolo PaniDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Aldo GenovesioDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Emiliano BrunamontiDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5119-6950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increase in the number of authors per article is a well-documented phenomenon across various academic disciplines. While prior studies have examined this trend in specific fields and countries, they in most cases did not compare the increase in the number of authors between countries. While it has previously shown that the number of authors in neuroscience publications has risen in the G10 countries, no study has yet addressed whether it reflects a global trend in the field. To address this gap, we quantified the global trend in the number of authors in neuroscience publications from 2001 to 2022. Our findings reveal a consistent increase in authorship across nearly all the countries examined. Italy ranks highest in terms of average authorship per article, while Ukraine ranks the lowest. On the other hand, China shows the largest increase in authorship over the years, followed by Norway and Egypt. South Korea is the only country showing a slight decreasing trend rather than growth. These results contribute to a better understanding of authorship patterns in neuroscience and can stimulate further investigations on the reasons behind such an increase in terms of socio-economic factors, the need for collaborative efforts in some fields, or, on the negative side, the effect of utilitarian reasons to meet career evaluation criteria.

Indexed as

AuthorshipBibliometricsNeurosciencesPublishingHumansANVURauthorship increaseneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID40164992
PMCPMC11958874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.