Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40164935›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025

Digital transformation of pathology - the European Society of Pathology expert opinion paper.

Catarina Eloy, Filippo Fraggetta, Paul J van Diest, António Polónia, Mónica Curado, Jordi Temprana-Salvador, Inti Zlobec, Elvira Purqueras, Cleo-Aron Weis, Xavier Matias-Guiu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. AI In Leukemia Diagnostics: Complementing the Pathologist's Role.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Application and Impact of Quality Assurance Dashboards in Cytology Laboratories-The CytoLog Application.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Report on the 2025 DICOM WSI Connectathon.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Catarina EloyPathology Laboratory, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho 45, 4200-135, Ipatimup, Portugal. catarinaeloy@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7642-1280
Filippo FraggettaPathology Department, Gravina Hospital, Caltagirone, ASP Catania, Italy.
Paul J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
António PolóniaPathology Laboratory, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho 45, 4200-135, Ipatimup, Portugal.
Mónica CuradoPathology Laboratory, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho 45, 4200-135, Ipatimup, Portugal.
Jordi Temprana-SalvadorDepartment of Pathology, Vall Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Inti ZlobecInstitute for Tissue Medicine and Pathology (ITMP), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Elvira PurquerasHospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
Cleo-Aron WeisInstitute of Pathology Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Xavier Matias-GuiuHospital U Arnau de Vilanova & University of Lleida IRBLLEIDA, Lleida, Spain.
Peter SchirmacherInstitute of Pathology Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Aleš RyškaThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, University Hospital Hradec Králové & Charles University Medical Faculty, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An expert group mandated by the European Society of Pathology (ESP) outlines its recommendations on the digital transformation of pathology departments, aiming to facilitate the acquisition of resources for better patient care. This statement is directed at pathology professionals, offering guidance for the safe implementation of digital pathology while emphasizing the necessity of standardization, quality control, and sustainability. Digital pathology involves automating and standardizing laboratory workflows to produce high-quality whole slide images (WSIs), which are crucial for diagnosis, research, and education. A successful digital transformation requires a multidisciplinary approach, significant investment in human, structural, and informatic resources, and progressive adaptation of laboratory workflows. Key components include robust infrastructure; continuous training; and clear policies for hardware renewal, data storage, and interoperability. The transition demands attention to quality and production control, ensuring efficient WSI generation and timely diagnostic reporting. ESP strongly recommends that pathology departments, supported by funding organizations, start to prioritize digital transformation as a step toward improved patient care and in alignment with global healthcare initiatives. Collaboration, investment, and adherence to quality standards are critical to benefiting the most the full potential of digital pathology.

Indexed as

Pathology, ClinicalTelepathologyEuropeHumansSocieties, MedicalDigital pathologyDigital transformationRecommendations

Identifiers

PMID40164935
PMCPMC12647291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.