Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40164913›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2025

A neural geometry approach comprehensively explains apparently conflicting models of visual perceptual learning.

Yu-Ang Cheng, Mehdi Sanayei, Xing Chen, Ke Jia, Sheng Li, Fang Fang, Takeo Watanabe, Alexander Thiele, Ru-Yuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yu-Ang ChengBrain Health Institute, National Center for Mental Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and School of Psychology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0145-1660
Mehdi SanayeiBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Xing ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ke JiaAffiliated Mental Health Center and Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Sheng LiSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6258-3147
Fang FangSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7718-2354
Takeo WatanabeDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4562-5376
Alexander ThieleBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ru-Yuan ZhangBrain Health Institute, National Center for Mental Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and School of Psychology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. ruyuanzhang@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0654-715X

Funding

SYSTEMATIC PSYCHOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION OF VISUAL LEARNINGR01EY019466 · NEI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Takeo Watanabe · 2009 to 2026
$6.6M
National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31930053National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32100901National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 3230085National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32441102National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) T2421004NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019466NSF | Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences | Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences (Behavioral & Cognitive Sciences) BCS-2241417RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) G0700976U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI) R01EY019466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual perceptual learning (VPL), defined as long-term improvement in a visual task, is considered a crucial tool for elucidating underlying visual and brain plasticity. Previous studies have proposed several neural models of VPL, including changes in neural tuning or in noise correlations. Here, to adjudicate different models, we propose that all neural changes at single units can be conceptualized as geometric transformations of population response manifolds in a high-dimensional neural space. Following this neural geometry approach, we identified neural manifold shrinkage due to reduced trial-by-trial population response variability, rather than tuning or correlation changes, as the primary mechanism of VPL. Furthermore, manifold shrinkage successfully explains VPL effects across artificial neural responses in deep neural networks, multivariate blood-oxygenation-level-dependent signals in humans and multiunit activities in monkeys. These converging results suggest that our neural geometry approach comprehensively explains a wide range of empirical results and reconciles previously conflicting models of VPL.

Indexed as

LearningModels, NeurologicalVisual PerceptionAnimalsHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronal Plasticity

Identifiers

PMID40164913
PMCPMC12106082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.