ArticleHepatology international2025
Integrating prior decompensation into ACLF definition to enhance clinical management.
Article in Hepatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a complicated syndrome associated with high short-term mortality and reversibility. Whether the prior decompensation should be included in the definition of ACLF is controversial.
methodsA total of 532 patients with decompensation (prior or first) of chronic liver disease were retrospectively enrolled and analyzed from January 2018 to June 2023. Clinical data were used to identify the characteristics and determine prognosis.
resultsOf the 532 patients, 99 patients did not meet APASL-ACLF criteria due to the existence of prior decompensation and 433 patients met the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL)-ACLF criteria. The two groups had similar characteristics including prognosis scores (Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B (COSSH)-ACLF II score: 7.59 vs. 7.67, p = 0.934; Chronic Liver Failure (CLIF) Consortium ACLF score: 42.90 vs. 44.81, p = 0.273), the distribution of patients with APASL ACLF research consortium score (AARC score) (5-7: 19.2%/12.0%; 8-10: 56.6%/55.0%; 11-15: 24.2%/33.0%, p > 0.05) and the 28-/90-day mortality rates (30.5%/43.2% vs. 36.3%/43.1%, p = 0.267/0.978). In all integrated ACLF patients, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that COSSH-ACLF IIs had higher prognostic efficiency and clinical net benefit than AARC score and CLIF-C ACLFs for 28-/90-day mortality.
conclusionPrior decompensated patients exhibited clinical characteristics and high short-term mortality similar to those of first decompensated patients. The COSSH-ACLF IIs demonstrated the highest prognostic efficiency for all integrated ACLF patients. Including prior decompensation in the ACLF definition can help to simplify and improve clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40164854What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.