ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Pushing the boundary: the incidence of complications and recurrences following robotic eTEP in BMI ≥ 35 versus BMI < 35 patients.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond acronyms: a domain-based structural analysis of abdominal wall hernia repair techniques in the contemporary literature.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Totally Extraperitoneal Approach with Preperitoneal Repair (PeTEP) for the Treatment of the Abdominal Wall Defects in Patients with Severe Obesity: A New Technique for a Long Standing Problem.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- How Reproducible Are Abdominal Wall Surgical Techniques? A Methodological Assessment of Technical Reporting in the Contemporary Literature.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Article
- Does (patient) size matter? the impact of body mass index on outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive transversus abdominis release.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionObesity not only contributes to the pathology of primary and incisional ventral hernias but is also associated with increased rates of post-operative complications and hernia recurrence after repair. Whether this holds true for complex robotic eTEP retrorectus hernia repair has not been well researched. The aim of this study was to determine whether obesity increases risks of short-term recurrence or complications after robotic abdominal wall reconstruction. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective chart review was performed for 102 robotic eTEP abdominal wall reconstructions completed at a single institution between 2019 and 2022. Independent variables included patient demographics, hernia characteristics, and intraoperative data. Primary outcomes included 30-day post-operative complications resulting in readmission/ED visits. Outcomes were compared between two cohorts: BMI < 35 and BMI ≥ 35. Univariate analysis was used to compare the incidence of complications between both groups.
resultsOur mean follow-up time was 59.2 +/- 98.7 days, and median was 18 days, with the range of 6-419 days. Of the 102 patients, the overall mean BMI was 32.1. 31 patients (30%) had a BMI ≥ 35, while 71 (70%) had a BMI < 35. The BMI ≥ 35 cohort had a mean BMI of 37.9, and the BMI < 35 cohort had a BMI of 29.6. There were no recurrences in the BMI ≥ 35 group and only one in the BMI < 35 group (0% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.51, 95% CI - 0.06 to 0.03). There were two complications in the BMI ≥ 35 group, and seven in the BMI < 35 group (6.5% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.58, 95% CI - 0.17 to 0.11).
conclusionsThe results of our single-center experience showed no significant increase in 30-day hernia recurrence or surgical site occurrences for patients with BMI ≥ 35 undergoing robotic eTEP. This study is limited by small patient cohort size and short follow-up interval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40164837What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.