ArticleBehavior research methods2025
On a generalizable approach for sample size determination in Bayesian t tests.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving statistical reporting in psychology.Communications psychology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Bayes factor is often proposed as a superior replacement to p values in testing null hypotheses for various reasons, with the availability of many user-friendly and easily accessible statistical software tools facilitating the use of Bayesian tests. Meanwhile, Bayes factor design analysis (BFDA), the counterpart of power analysis, is also proposed to ensure the maximum efficiency and informativeness of a study. Despite tools for conducting BFDA being limited and mostly relying on Monte Carlo methodology, methods based on root-finding algorithms have been recently developed (e.g., Pawel and Held, 2025), overcoming weaknesses of simulation approaches. This paper builds on these advancements by presenting a method generalizing the existing approach for conducting BFDA for sample size determination in t tests. The major advantage of the current method is that it does not assume normality of the effect size estimate, allowing more flexibility in the specification of the design and analysis priors. We developed and showcase a user-friendly Shiny app for facilitating the use of BFDA, illustrated with an empirical example. Furthermore, using our method, we explore the operating characteristics of the Bayes factors using various priors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.