Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40164766›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

On a generalizable approach for sample size determination in Bayesian t tests.

Tsz Keung Wong, Jorge N Tendeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Improving statistical reporting in psychology.Communications psychology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tsz Keung WongDepartment of Methodology & Statistics, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB, Tilburg, The Netherlands. t.k.wong3004@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-8328
Jorge N TendeiroGraduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1660-3642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Bayes factor is often proposed as a superior replacement to p values in testing null hypotheses for various reasons, with the availability of many user-friendly and easily accessible statistical software tools facilitating the use of Bayesian tests. Meanwhile, Bayes factor design analysis (BFDA), the counterpart of power analysis, is also proposed to ensure the maximum efficiency and informativeness of a study. Despite tools for conducting BFDA being limited and mostly relying on Monte Carlo methodology, methods based on root-finding algorithms have been recently developed (e.g., Pawel and Held, 2025), overcoming weaknesses of simulation approaches. This paper builds on these advancements by presenting a method generalizing the existing approach for conducting BFDA for sample size determination in t tests. The major advantage of the current method is that it does not assume normality of the effect size estimate, allowing more flexibility in the specification of the design and analysis priors. We developed and showcase a user-friendly Shiny app for facilitating the use of BFDA, illustrated with an empirical example. Furthermore, using our method, we explore the operating characteristics of the Bayes factors using various priors.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremSample SizeAlgorithmsData Interpretation, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodResearch DesignSoftwareBayes factorDesign analysisPower analysisSample size determination

Identifiers

PMID40164766
PMCPMC11958428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.