Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40164752›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparing machine learning models for osteoporosis prediction in Tibetan middle aged and elderly women.

Peng Wang, Qiang Yin, Kangzhi Ding, Huaichang Zhong, Qundi Jia, Zhasang Xiao, Hai Xiong

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peng Wang *School of Medicine, Tibet University, Lhasa, 850000, China.
Qiang Yin *School of Ecology and Environment, Tibet University, Lhasa, 850000, China.
Kangzhi DingSchool of Medicine, Tibet University, Lhasa, 850000, China.
Huaichang ZhongHospital Infection Management Department, The First People's Hospital of Shuangliu District, West China Airport Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610200, China.
Qundi JiaSchool of Medicine, Tibet University, Lhasa, 850000, China.
Zhasang XiaoSchool of Medicine, Tibet University, Lhasa, 850000, China. 58749403@qq.com.
Hai XiongSchool of Medicine, Tibet University, Lhasa, 850000, China. xhxysq@126.com.

Funding

the "Belt and Road" Science and Technology Innovation of Ali Regional Science and Technology Bureau 18080036the Central Financial Support for the Reform and Development of Local Universities 00060585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish the optimal prediction model by comparing the prediction effect of 6 kinds of prediction models containing biochemical indexes on the risk of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly women in Tibet. This study adopted a multi-stage cluster random sampling cross-sectional survey method. From January 2022 to January 2024, we obtained biochemical and bone mineral density (BMD) data from high altitudes in Tibet. We built a predictive model of osteoporosis in three steps. First, we performed feature selection to identify factors associated with osteoporosis. Next, the eligible participants were randomly divided into a training set and a test set in a ratio of 8:2. Then, the prediction model of osteoporosis was established based on Random Forest, ANN, XGB, and SVM. Finally, we compared the performance of the prediction models using sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to select the best prediction model. Correlation analysis was used to screen indicators with statistical differences from T-score. Finally, Age (P < 0.01), LDL-C (P < 0.05), UA (P < 0.01), AST (P < 0.05), CREA (P < 0.01), BMI (P < 0.01), ALT (P < 0.01) were associated with osteoporosis. In train set, the order of AUC from highest to lowest is Random Forest (1.000), XGB (0.887), SVM (0.868), regression (0.801), ANN (0.793) and OSTA (0.739). In test set, the order of AUC from highest to lowest is XGB (0.848), regression (0.801), Random Forest (0.772), SVM (0.755), OSTA (0.739), ANN (0.732). SVM and XGB algorithm models had better screening effect on osteoporosis than OSTA in middle-aged and elderly Tibetan residents in Tibet. Compared with Random Forest, ANN and SVM, the established XGB model had the best prediction ability and can be used to predict the risk of osteoporosis on biochemical indexes. The model needs to be further improved through large sample research.

Indexed as

Machine LearningOsteoporosisAgedBone DensityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsROC CurveTibetExtreme gradient boostingOsteoporosisPrediction modelTibet

Identifiers

PMID40164752
PMCPMC11958675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.