ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparing machine learning models for osteoporosis prediction in Tibetan middle aged and elderly women.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An explainable machine learning model for predicting one-year osteoporosis risk: development and validation in a prospective cohort.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Progress in machine learning-assisted medical imaging for osteoarthritis and osteoporosis diagnosis: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- The relationship between the polymorphisms and mutations of OPG gene and bone metabolism in postmenopausal women in northwest China.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatology: From Algorithms to Clinical Impact in Osteoporosis and Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- An explainable machine learning framework for cardiovascular risk prediction using structured health data.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for osteoporosis based on clinical characteristics in Kunming.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to establish the optimal prediction model by comparing the prediction effect of 6 kinds of prediction models containing biochemical indexes on the risk of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly women in Tibet. This study adopted a multi-stage cluster random sampling cross-sectional survey method. From January 2022 to January 2024, we obtained biochemical and bone mineral density (BMD) data from high altitudes in Tibet. We built a predictive model of osteoporosis in three steps. First, we performed feature selection to identify factors associated with osteoporosis. Next, the eligible participants were randomly divided into a training set and a test set in a ratio of 8:2. Then, the prediction model of osteoporosis was established based on Random Forest, ANN, XGB, and SVM. Finally, we compared the performance of the prediction models using sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to select the best prediction model. Correlation analysis was used to screen indicators with statistical differences from T-score. Finally, Age (P < 0.01), LDL-C (P < 0.05), UA (P < 0.01), AST (P < 0.05), CREA (P < 0.01), BMI (P < 0.01), ALT (P < 0.01) were associated with osteoporosis. In train set, the order of AUC from highest to lowest is Random Forest (1.000), XGB (0.887), SVM (0.868), regression (0.801), ANN (0.793) and OSTA (0.739). In test set, the order of AUC from highest to lowest is XGB (0.848), regression (0.801), Random Forest (0.772), SVM (0.755), OSTA (0.739), ANN (0.732). SVM and XGB algorithm models had better screening effect on osteoporosis than OSTA in middle-aged and elderly Tibetan residents in Tibet. Compared with Random Forest, ANN and SVM, the established XGB model had the best prediction ability and can be used to predict the risk of osteoporosis on biochemical indexes. The model needs to be further improved through large sample research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.