Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40164738›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Hybrid weighted fuzzy production rule extraction utilizing modified harmony search and BPNN.

Feng Qin, Azlan Mohd Zain, Kai-Qing Zhou, De-Bing Zhuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Feng QinFaculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, 81310, Malaysia.
Azlan Mohd ZainFaculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, 81310, Malaysia.
Kai-Qing ZhouSchool of Communication and Electronic Engineering, Jishou University, Jishou, 416000, China. kqzhou@jsu.edu.cn.
De-Bing ZhuoSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jishou University, Zhangjiajie, 427000, China.

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia through the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) FRGS/1/2022/ICT02/UTM/01/1National Natural Science Foundation of China 62066016Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China 2024JJ7395Scientific Research Project of Education Department of Hunan Province of China 22B0549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weighted Fuzzy Production Rules (WFPRs) are vital for Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs), significantly impacting diagnostic accuracy and bridging the gap between data-driven insights and actionable clinical decisions through knowledge engineering. This paper proposes an integrated approach combining the Dynamic Dimension Adjustment Harmony Search (DDA-HS) Algorithm and Back Propagation Neural Networks (BPNNs) to enhance WFPR extraction accuracy. DDA-HS dynamically adjusts search space dimensions through fitness evaluations, optimizing initial weights in BPNNs and leveraging an absorbing Markov chain to enhance transition probabilities, supporting exploration and avoiding local optima in high-dimensional spaces. Evaluated against existing optimization methods including Harmony Search (HS), Cuckoo Search (CS), Adaptive Global Optimal Harmony Search (AGOHS), and Harmony Search with Cuckoo Search (HSCS) Algorithms, DDA-HS achieves 74.48% accuracy for BPNN classification and 77.08% for WFPR classification on the PIMA dataset, representing improvements of 3.6% and 6.5%, respectively. WFPR extraction enhances BPNN interpretability by revealing feature influences on decision-making, improving both accuracy and transparency. The proposed method offers a robust framework for reliable and interpretable CDSSs in healthcare.

Indexed as

BPNNsCDSSsDDA-HSInterpretabilityOptimizationWFPRs

Identifiers

PMID40164738
PMCPMC11958705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.