Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40164735›Full record

ReviewNature genetics2025

Causal machine learning for single-cell genomics.

Alejandro Tejada-Lapuerta, Paul Bertin, Stefan Bauer, Hananeh Aliee, Yoshua Bengio, Fabian J Theis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alejandro Tejada-Lapuerta *Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.
Paul Bertin *Mila, the Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Stefan BauerSchool of Computing, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hananeh AlieeWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK. ha10@sanger.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5782-6450
Yoshua BengioMila, the Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. yoshua.bengio@mila.quebec.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9322-3515
Fabian J TheisInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany. fabian.theis@helmholtz-munich.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-1943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in single-cell '-omics' allow unprecedented insights into the transcriptional profiles of individual cells and, when combined with large-scale perturbation screens, enable measuring of the effect of targeted perturbations on the whole transcriptome. These advances provide an opportunity to better understand the causative role of genes in complex biological processes. In this Perspective, we delineate the application of causal machine learning to single-cell genomics and its associated challenges. We first present the causal model that is most commonly applied to single-cell biology and then identify and discuss potential approaches to three open problems: the lack of generalization of models to novel experimental conditions, the complexity of interpreting learned models, and the difficulty of learning cell dynamics.

Indexed as

GenomicsMachine LearningSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingHumansTranscriptome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.