ArticleScientific reports2025
New insights into the cultivability of human milk bacteria from ingestion to digestion and implications for their Immunomodulatory properties.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Microbiota composition of human milk based on storage and processing methods in Korea.Nutrition research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human milk (HM) microbiota is increasingly studied for its potential health benefits. However, the physiological state of HM bacteria and consequently their effects on gut homeostasis remain a question. This study investigated the physiological state of the HM microbiota by characterizing its cultivable fraction as it might be at the point of ingestion and assessing the effects of digestion, in the specific context of the immature infant digestive tract, on the cultivability and immunomodulatory properties of six HM strains representative of prevalent genera in HM. Twenty-eight HM samples were analysed by 16 S metabarcoding either directly on raw milk (raw milk microbiota, RM) or on the complete cultivable fraction obtained from seven non-selective media (cultivable milk microbiota, CM). This approach enabled a more in-depth investigation of CM than conventional methods based on the individual sequencing of a subset of isolates and resulted in a moderate gain in diversity within each HM sample. It confirmed that diversity was lower in CM than in RM, with ~ 7 versus 69 genera per sample in CM and RM respectively, and an under-representation of strictly anaerobic genera in CM. In vitro infant gastrointestinal digestion resulted in overall good survival of the 6 HM strains but partial or complete loss of their immunomodulatory properties on the monocyte THP1 cell line, except for a Staphylococcus epidermidis strain that gained immunomodulatory potential. These results highlight the potential of HM bacteria to survive during the infant gastrointestinal digestion and interact with the intestinal epithelium and immune system, as well as the importance of considering the digestion process when evaluating host-bacteria interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.