ArticleScientific reports2025
Altered internetwork functional connectivity and graph analysis of occipital regions in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis accompanied by olfactory dysfunction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study assessed whole-brain functional connectivity and network graph theory indices in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with (CRSwOD) and without (CRSsOD) olfactory dysfunction. We also analyzed correlations between the abnormal network metrics and clinical indices. We acquired resting-state functional magnetic resonance images from 31 patients with CRSsOD, 26 with CRSwOD, and 25 healthy controls (HCs). Functional connectivity was computed and graph theory metrics were evaluated based on the Dosenbach-160 Atlas; relationships between neuroimaging indicators and clinical scales were assessed using Pearson correlation analysis. The results showed that CRSsOD patients had 11 edges with greater strength than HCs, CRSwOD patients had 1 greater edge than HCs, and CRSsOD patients had 5 greater edges than CRSwOD patients. Nodal degree centrality and efficiency in the right posterior occipital region were significantly altered in patients with CRSsOD compared with those in CRSwOD and in HCs. Five and two edges correlated with clinical scales in patients with CRSsOD and CRSwOD, respectively, whereas no correlations in global and nodal indicators were found. These results imply that distinct brain network patterns, particularly in the occipital cortex, could be a valid neuroimaging marker for related diagnosis and prognosis of CRSsOD and CRSwOD patients, and contribute to our better understanding of the central neural mechanisms of CRSwOD, providing new ideas for the clinical management of CRSwOD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.