ArticleScientific reports2025
Back analysis of mechanical parameters based on GPSO-BP neural network and its application.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rock mass mechanical parameters are essential for the design and construction of underground engineering projects, but parameters obtained through traditional methods are often unsuitable for direct use in numerical simulations. The back analysis method, based on displacement monitoring, has emerged as a new approach for determining rock mass parameters. In this study, an experimental scheme was developed using orthogonal and uniform experimental designs to obtain training samples for the neural network. A GA-PSO-BP neural network model (GPSO-BP) was proposed, combining the fast convergence of the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm and the global optimization capability of the genetic algorithm (GA). This model was applied to invert the rock mass parameters E, μ, φ, and c for deep-buried tunnels. The results indicate that the GPSO-BP neural network model outperforms the BP, GA-BP, and PSO-BP neural network models in terms of faster convergence and higher accuracy. It also shows superior performance in handling small datasets and complex problems, achieving better data fitting and the highest score in rank analysis. The DDR curve further confirms the GPSO-BP model's computational efficiency. When the rock mass parameters derived from this model are applied to forward numerical simulations, the average error across four monitoring projects is only 4.34%, outperforming the other three models. Thus, this study provides an effective method for improving the accuracy of rock mass parameter inversion in underground engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.