Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40164675›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cancelable biometric authentication leveraging empirical mode decomposition and quaternion representations for IoT security.

Mahmoud Nasr, Krzysztof Brzostowski, Adam Piórkowski, Fathi E Abd El-Samie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahmoud NasrDepartment of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059, Krakow, Poland. nasr@agh.edu.pl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9649-0398
Krzysztof BrzostowskiDepartment of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370, Wroclaw, Poland.
Adam PiórkowskiDepartment of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059, Krakow, Poland.
Fathi E Abd El-SamieDepartment of Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University, Menouf, 32952, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-9518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biometric authentication is essential for securing Internet of Things (IoT) devices, yet the vulnerability of biometric data to breaches underscores the necessity for improved security measures. Cancelable biometric sysems, which convert original biometric data into non-reversible templates, offer a strong solution for user privacy preservation. This paper presents an innovative method for creating cancelable biometric templates by integrating Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and quaternion mathematics. The EMD disaggregates biometric data into Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs), whereas quaternion transformations guarantee the safety and non-reproducibility characteristics of the templates. The proposed method ensures template diversity and IoT systems' efficiency. Experimental assessments indicate the method robustness against possible attacks, attaining an Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AROC) of 0.9997 and an almost negligible Equal Error Rate (EER). Moreover, the system has a minimal computational cost, rendering it appropriate for resource-limited IoT settings. These findings highlight the method capacity to tackle significant security issues, while ensuring optimal performance in practical applications.

Identifiers

PMID40164675
PMCPMC11958808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.