ArticleScientific reports2025
Structural optimization, compressive strength analysis, and application exploration of triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) in interior design.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In modern interior design, the selection of materials and structural optimization are critical to achieving both functionality and aesthetic appeal. Triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS), with their outstanding mechanical properties and lightweight characteristics, have increasingly attracted the attention of designers. In this study, Gyroid (G) TPMS structures were fabricated using LCD-based photopolymerization technology, and ten models with periodic parameter T ranging from [1/5, 2] were designed. Finite element simulations and experimental validations were employed to thoroughly analyze the structural optimization and compressive strength of G surfaces, particularly when T = 1/3. The results revealed that at T = 1/3, G surfaces exhibited minimal stress concentration, a moderate number of meshes, and optimal values for compression crush rate and porosity error. Furthermore, with T = 1/3 and a porosity of 50%, additional parameters such as surface offset, cell thickness, offset thickness, and gradient distribution were adjusted to design four distinct G surface structures. Compression tests were conducted to investigate the effects of different loading directions on mechanical properties, deformation behavior, and energy absorption. It was found that under vertical loading, the surface-offset G surface exhibited the highest energy absorption and efficiency, while under parallel loading, the cell-thickness G surface demonstrated the most stable deformation. The application of these structures in interior design is thoroughly discussed, emphasizing how TPMS can serve as effective structural systems and innovative spatial elements. This study provides a solid theoretical foundation and extensive experimental evidence for the application of TPMS structures in interior design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.