ArticleScientific reports2025
Ultrasound-based incidence of coarctation of the aorta in true and false positive fetuses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fetal Echocardiography Enhances Perinatal Care for Coarctation of the Aorta: Balancing Risk of Hemodynamic Compromise and Resource Utilization.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- The Three-Y and Trachea View (3Y + T): A Conceptual Extension of the Three-Vessel and Trachea View for Comprehensive Fetal Echocardiographic Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hemodynamic and developmental biomarkers enhance prenatal coarctation prediction: a validated multiparametric ultrasound model.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the incidence and significant ultrasound parameter changes of coarctation of the aorta (CoA) among fetuses with suspected CoA, pregnant women with suspected CoA fetuses on prenatal ultrasound examination were prospectively enrolled. The CoA presence was confirmed after birth by computed tomographic angiography, ultrasound, surgery or autopsies. The ultrasound parameters were analyzed. Among 133 fetuses with suspected CoA, 44 (33.1%) pregnant women with CoA fetuses were confirmed after delivery with an age range 20-41 (31.36 ± 4.73) years and a gestational age range 20.5-36.5 (27.35 ± 4.52) weeks, and 89 (66.9%) pregnant women were confirmed to have false-positive CoA fetuses with matched (P > 0.05) age (range 21-44 and mean 30.96 ± 4.59 years) and gestational age (range 19.6-34.1 and mean 28.22 ± 3.28 weeks). Ductus arteriosus (DA) tortuosity was present in significantly (P < 0.05) more false-positive CoA fetuses (15 or 16.85%) than in true CoA fetuses (1 or 2.27%), whereas significantly more intracardiac malformation [25 (56.82%) vs. 31 (34.83%)] and ventricular septal defect [10 (22.73%) vs. 6 (6.74%)] took place in true CoA fetuses than in the counterparts. Significant (P < 0.05) independent risk factors for CoA presence were sagittal view isthmic Z-score (odds ratio or OR 3.62 and 95% confidence interval or CI 2.06-7.15), coarctation shelf (OR 17.71 and 95% CI 5.52-56.78), ascending aortic diameter (OR 109.67 and 95% CI 3.03-21068.82), and DA velocity time integral (VTI) (OR 24.98 and 95% CI 1.26-759.94). The cutoff value and AUC were 0.40 and 0.912, respectively, for the fitted model, -4.24 and 0.779 for isthmus Z-score, 0.35 and 0.685 for the ascending aorta diameter, and 13.78 and 0.623 for DA VTI. In conclusion, many ultrasound parameters are significantly different in CoA fetuses, and sagittal view isthmus Z-score, coarctation shelf, ascending aortic diameter, DA VTI may independently affect CoA presence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.