Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40164642›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Human activity recognition algorithms for manual material handling activities.

Andreas Sochopoulos, Tommaso Poliero, Jamil Ahmad, Darwin G Caldwell, Christian Di Natali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas Sochopoulos *Department of Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163, Genova, Italy.
Tommaso Poliero *Department of Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163, Genova, Italy.
Jamil AhmadDepartment of Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163, Genova, Italy.
Darwin G CaldwellDepartment of Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163, Genova, Italy.
Christian Di NataliDepartment of Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163, Genova, Italy. christian.dinatali@iit.it.

Funding

H2020 101015418Horizon 101058548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using wearable sensors has prompted substantial interest in recent years due to the availability and low cost of Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs). HAR using IMUs can aid both the ergonomic evaluation of the performed activities and, more recently, with the development of exoskeleton technologies, can assist with the selection of precisely tailored assisting strategies. However, there needs to be more research regarding the identification of diverse lifting styles, which requires appropriate datasets and the proper selection of hyperparameters for the employed classification algorithms. This paper offers insight into the effect of sensor placement, number of sensors, time window, classifier complexity, and IMU data types used in the classification of lifting styles. The analyzed classifiers are feedforward neural networks, 1-D convolutional neural networks, and recurrent neural networks, standard architectures in time series classification but offer different classification capabilities and computational complexity. This is of the utmost importance when inference is expected to occur in an embedded platform such as an occupational exoskeleton. It is shown that accurate lifting style detection requires multiple sensors, sufficiently long time windows, and classifier architectures able to leverage the temporal nature of the data since the differences are subtle from a kinematic point of view but significantly impact the possibility of injuries.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsErgonomicsHuman ActivitiesLiftingBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansNeural Networks, ComputerWearable Electronic DevicesConvolutional neural networksFeedforward neural networksHuman activity recognitionIndustrial wearable technologiesRecurrent neural networks

Identifiers

PMID40164642
PMCPMC11958700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.