Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40164584›Full record

ArticleBlood cancer journal2025

Oral decitabine cedazuridine with and without venetoclax in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a propensity score-matched study.

Alex Bataller, Koji Sasaki, Samuel Urrutia, Guillermo Montalban-Bravo, Alexandre Bazinet, Kelly Chien, Danielle Hammond, Ian M Bouligny, Mahesh Swaminathan, Ghayas Issa and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cancer journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Allogeneic Transplant for CMML.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2025
    Review
  5. Clinical management of CMML-State of the art.British journal of haematology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Alex BatallerDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. abataller@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0002-6085-2745
Koji SasakiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9140-0610
Samuel UrrutiaDivision of Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Guillermo Montalban-BravoDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Alexandre BazinetDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kelly ChienDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Danielle HammondDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6017-2264
Ian M BoulignyDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mahesh SwaminathanDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5959-397X
Ghayas IssaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4339-8683
Nicholas ShortDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2983-2738
Naval DaverDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7103-373X
Courtney D DiNardoDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9003-0390
Tapan KadiaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9892-9832
Elias JabbourDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4465-6119
Farhad RavandiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7621-377X
Gail J RobozWeill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Michael SavonaVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Elizabeth A GriffithsRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0288-8248
James McCloskeyHackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Olatoyosi OdenikeThe University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Aram OganesianTaiho Oncology, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Harold N KeerTaiho Oncology, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Mohammad AzabTaiho Oncology, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Hagop KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1908-3307
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3631-2482

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) are indicated in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). The combination of hypomethylating agents with venetoclax (Ven) has demonstrated promising results in these diseases, although randomized clinical trials are needed for validation. In this retrospective study, we compared two matched cohorts of patients with MDS or CMML: one receiving oral decitabine-cedazuridine (DEC-C, n = 73) and one receiving DEC-C and Ven (DEC-C-Ven, n = 51), in three contemporary clinical trials. The aim is to determine the impact of the addition of Ven to HMA in MDS and CMML. Individuals were matched using a propensity score approach that was based on the IPSS-M score and age. All patients had excess blasts; 84% were diagnosed with MDS and 16% with CMML. Most patients had high- or very high-risk disease, according to the revised IPSS-R. The overall response rate was superior in the DEC-C-Ven cohort (90% vs 64%, P = 0.002). The median times to best response were 1.1 and 2.7 months for the DEC-C-Ven and DEC-C cohorts, respectively (P < 0.001). More patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the DEC-C-Ven cohort (47%) than in the DEC-C cohort (16%, P < 0.001). The 4- and 8-week mortality did not significantly differ between the DEC-C and DEC-C-Ven cohorts. Patients in the DEC-C-Ven cohort had a more profound neutropenia at days 15 and 21 of the first cycle. The median overall survival was 24 and 19 months for the DEC-C-Ven and DEC-C cohorts, respectively (P = 0.89), and the median event-free survival durations were 18 and 10 months (P = 0.026). In conclusion, the addition of Ven resulted in improved response rates and outcomes in specific subgroups; prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsLeukemia, Myelomonocytic, ChronicMyelodysplastic SyndromesAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicDecitabineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesSulfonamidesBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocycliccedazuridineDecitabineSulfonamidesUridinevenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID40164584
PMCPMC11958769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.