ArticleLight, science & applications2025
Miniaturized disordered photonic molecule spectrometer.
Article in Light, science & applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geometrical-optics resonator photonics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Hyper-spectral photonic integrated circuits based on recursive inverse design.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Wavelength-scale noise-resistant on-chip spectrometer.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Resonant microtaper leaky-mode computational spectropolarimetry with tens of femtometers spectral resolution and full Stokes measurement.Nature communications · 2026Article
- i-PHAOS: An Overview with an Open-Source Collaborative Database on Miniaturized Integrated Spectrometers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The burgeoning field of computational spectrometers is rapidly advancing, providing a pathway to highly miniaturized, on-chip systems for in-situ or portable measurements. The performance of these systems is typically limited in its encoder section. The response matrix is largely compromised with redundancies, due to the periodic intensity or overly smooth responses. As such, the inherent interdependence among the physical size, resolution, and bandwidth of spectral encoders poses a challenge to further miniaturization progress. Achieving high spectral resolution necessitates a long optical path length, leading to a larger footprint required for sufficient spectral decorrelation, resulting in a limited detectable free-spectral range (FSR). Here, we report a groundbreaking ultra-miniaturized disordered photonic molecule spectrometer that surpasses the resolution-bandwidth-footprint metric of current spectrometers. This computational spectrometer utilizes complicated electromagnetic coupling to determinately generate quasi-random spectral response matrices, a feature absents in other state-of-the-art systems, fundamentally overcoming limitations present in the current technologies. This configuration yields an effectively infinite FSR while upholding a high Q-factor ( > 7.74 × 10
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.