Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40164509›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

The Inattentional Rhythm in Audition.

Troby Ka-Yan Lui, Eva Boglietti, Benedikt Zoefel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Troby Ka-Yan LuiUniversité de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse 31400, France trobylui@gmail.com benedikt.zoefel@cnrs.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-1606-6843
Eva BogliettiUniversité de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse 31400, France.
Benedikt ZoefelUniversité de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse 31400, France trobylui@gmail.com benedikt.zoefel@cnrs.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of temporally unpredictable visual targets depends on the preceding phase of alpha oscillations (∼7-12 Hz). In audition, however, such an effect seemed to be absent. Due to the transient nature of its input, the auditory system might be particularly vulnerable to information loss that occurs if relevant information coincides with the low-excitability phase of the oscillation. We therefore hypothesized that effects of oscillatory phase in audition will be restored if auditory events are made task irrelevant and information loss can be tolerated. To this end, we collected electroencephalography (EEG) data from 29 human participants (21F) while they detected pure tones at one sound frequency and ignored others. Confirming our hypothesis, we found that the neural response to task-irrelevant but not to task-relevant tones depends on the prestimulus phase of neural oscillations. Alpha oscillations modulated early stages of stimulus processing, whereas theta oscillations (∼3-7 Hz) affected later components, possibly related to distractor inhibition. We also found evidence that alpha oscillations alternate between sound frequencies during divided attention. Together, our results suggest that the efficacy of auditory oscillations depends on the context they operate in and demonstrate how they can be employed in a system that heavily relies on information unfolding over time.

Indexed as

Alpha RhythmAttentionAuditory PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultauditory attentionevoked responseneural oscillationsphaserhythmic cognition

Identifiers

PMID40164509
PMCPMC12079742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.