Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40164491›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2025

How GPs approach physical activity discussion in routine care: a qualitative study of video-recorded consultations.

Neha Giri, Kimberley Norman, Elizabeth Ann Sturgiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neha GiriSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Kimberley NormanSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Kimberley.norman@monash.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-5451
Elizabeth Ann SturgissSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4428-4060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical activity (PA) engagement is critical for improving health and wellbeing across nearly all patient health concerns. General practitioners (GPs) are well positioned to have discussions about PA owing to the frequency with which they see their patients over long periods of time.

aimTo explore (a) how PA is discussed and (b) the types of PA that are discussed in real-world GP-patient consultations. DESIGN &

settingA qualitative descriptive study using real-world video-recorded consultations with Melbourne-based GPs.

methodSecondary analysis of 43 video consultation data from four GPs held with the Digital Library repository at Monash University, Australia. Two researchers reviewed the consultations and analysed each consultation using descriptive content analysis.

resultsFrom the total consultations (

conclusionGPs discuss PA with patients in opportunistic or systematic ways using a patient-centred approach. This study could be used as a foundation for establishing teaching resources for GPs, both in training and in professional development. Future studies could explore how PA discussions improve health outcomes over longer periods of time. This will contribute to understanding how, and if, PA is followed-up to further understand the effectiveness of these discussions.

Indexed as

communicationexercisegeneral practicepreventionprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID40164491
PMCPMC12728873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.