ArticleBJGP open2025
The patient path to diagnosis of atrial fibrillation: a qualitative study in primary care.
Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is underdiagnosed and approximately 10% of ischaemic strokes occur in people with unrecognised AF.
aimTo explore the patient path to diagnosis of AF and identify ways to improve detection. DESIGN &
settingQualitative study in UK primary care.
methodWe interviewed patients with a recent diagnosis of AF (<6 months) to understand their path to diagnosis, and interviewed primary care clinicians to explore their experience of detecting AF. The data were analysed using framework analysis.
resultsThirty patients and ten primary care clinicians were interviewed. Patients with non-specific symptoms generally did not perceive the symptoms as serious, and many delayed seeing a healthcare professional. Their experiences in primary care aligned with findings from interviews with primary care clinicians, who acknowledged that AF may not necessarily be the initial suspicion when a patient presents with certain non-specific symptoms. Primary care clinicians described narratives of good practice in the form of opportunistic pulse palpation, and challenges of detecting AF in primary care such as lack of access to Holter tests and limited opportunities to detect AF as a result of remote consultations and healthcare assistants taking on more responsibilities.
conclusionOur findings suggest that increased public awareness of AF could improve symptom appraisal and help-seeking from healthcare professionals. Recommending opportunistic pulse palpation in primary care is also indicated. Access to Holter tests and other devices in primary care may help reduce delays in diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.