Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40164352›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2025

Comprehensive Molecular Analysis in NRG Oncology/RTOG 9813: A Phase 3 Study of Radiation and Temozolomide Versus Radiation and BCNU/CCNU in Anaplastic Astrocytoma.

Jessica L Fleming, Stephanie L Pugh, Susan M Chang, Joseph P McElroy, Aline P Becker, Kenneth D Aldape, Helen A Shih, Lynn Stuart Ashby, Grant K Hunter, Jean-Paul Bahary and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jessica L FlemingOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Stephanie L PughNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Susan M ChangUCSF Medical Center-Mount Zion, San Francisco, California.
Joseph P McElroyOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Aline P BeckerOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Kenneth D AldapeNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Helen A ShihMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lynn Stuart AshbyArizona Oncology Services Foundation, Phoenix, Arizona.
Grant K HunterIntermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah.
Jean-Paul BaharyCentre Hospitalier de l`Université De Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Christopher J SchultzFroedtert and The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Brian D KavanaghUniversity of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado.
Vinay K PuduvalliUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
H Ian RobinsUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin.
Maria Werner-WasikThomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Minesh MehtaMiami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida.
Arnab ChakravartiOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: Arnab.Chakravarti@osumc.edu.

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Elaina Harper · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A. Woyach · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
OSU as Network Lead Academic Participating Site for the NCI NCTNU10CA180850 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BLUM, KRISTIE A, CHAKRAVARTI, ARNAB · 2014 to 2018
$6.8M
National Clinical Trials Network Research at the University of WisconsinUG1CA233277 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Lisa M Barroilhet, Andrew M. Baschnagel · 2019 to 2026
$4.9M
Signal Transduction Pathways in GlioblastomaR01CA108633 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAKRAVARTI, ARNAB · 2005 to 2009
$2.3M
TOWARDS A REFINED MOLECULAR RECURSIVE PARTITIONING ANALYSIS MODEL FOR GLIOBLASTOMRC2CA148190 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI ALDAPE, KENNETH D, CHAKRAVARTI, ARNAB · 2009 to 2010
$2.1M
Therapeutic Exploitation of Mutant BRAF for AstrocytomaR01CA169368 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI HOUGHTON, PETER J · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS R01 CA108633NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169368NCI NIH HHS RC2 CA148190NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180850NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is a need to better understand the molecular features that characterize grade 3 astrocytomas and their significance in predicting clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the significance of the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO)-defined molecular subgroups, along with MGMT promoter methylation, and other alterations in NRG Oncology/RTOG 9813. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Mutation status was determined by immunohistochemistry and/or next-generation sequencing. Copy number alterations and MGMT methylation were determined by Affymetrix Oncoscan and/or Illumina 450K arrays. Progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and tested using the log-rank test. Multivariable analyses used Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsApplication of the 2021 WHO-defined criteria resulted in the reclassification of 26/79 (33%) patients to grade 4 astrocytoma, IDH-mutant or glioblastoma. When looking at newly assigned molecular grade, grade 3 patients experienced longer survival outcomes compared to grade 4 patients. As individual biomarkers, IDH1/2 mutations, MGMT promoter methylation, and ATRX mutations were each associated with longer survival, whereas TERT promoter mutations, EGFR amplification, and gain of chromosome 7/loss of 10 (Chr+7/-10) were associated with shorter survival. Similar survival outcomes were observed for MGMT methylated patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) or RT and BCNU/CCNU, and MGMT unmethylated patients treated with RT and TMZ. Additionally, IDH-mutant patients seemed to respond well to the addition of TMZ.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated the importance of classifying patients according to the 2021 WHO-defined criteria. The majority of IDH-wildtype anaplastic astrocytomas (grade 3) were reclassified as glioblastoma (grade 4). These analyses also shed light on the efficacy of TMZ in certain molecular subgroups, where the addition of TMZ to RT appeared to benefit patients regardless of MGMT methylation status.

Indexed as

AstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyTemozolomideAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesErbB ReceptorsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingATRX protein, humanDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesErbB ReceptorsIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanTelomeraseTemozolomideTERT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsX-linked Nuclear Protein

Identifiers

PMID40164352
PMCPMC12857254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.