ArticleBone & joint research2025
Finite element analysis safety of tibial cortex transverse transport.
Article in Bone & joint research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Research advances in limb salvage treatment of diabetic foot using tibial transverse transport].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Tibial cortex transverse transport accelerates diabetic wound healing via systemic mobilization of non-classical monocytes : an animal study.Bone & joint research · 2026Article
- A Real-Time Mechanical Information Acquisition System and Finite Element Prediction Method for Limb Lengthening: A Pilot In Vivo Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Tibial cortex transverse transport (TTT) represents an innovative surgical technique used in managing lower limb ischaemic conditions, focusing specifically on diabetic foot ulcers. This study aimed to assess the safety of TTT by evaluating the stress magnitude and distribution on the tibia and tibial osteotomy blocks. Methods: A 3D finite element model was developed to simulate the TTT system, including the tibia, osteotomy blocks, skin, and TTT device. The models were reconstructed using Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and analyzed with Ansys finite element processing software. To estimate the fracture risk under specific conditions, we calculated the stress limits and distribution the tibia could withstand without fracturing under various loading scenarios, such as torsion and axial compression. Results: The results indicate that stress on the tibial cortex increased progressively with the advancement of bone transport fixation adjustment, and was primarily concentrated around the pinholes used to lift the osteotomy block. No significant differences were observed between the control and TTT groups. Conclusion: Through finite element analysis, it was determined that TTT does not compromise the overall stability of the tibia, and the TTT device provides protection against bone fracture caused by window-cutting in diabetic patients. Therefore, to preserve the TTT system's stability, its components must be protected from high-impact forces.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.