ArticleAmerican journal of veterinary research2025
Development and validation of a chronic diagnosis inventory that enables reliable documentation of canine multimorbidity in the Dog Aging Project.
Article in American journal of veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a novel chronic diagnosis inventory (CDI) to enable the study of canine multimorbidity. Methods: An initial CDI draft was created by a veterinary internist, a veterinary epidemiologist, and a human health epidemiologist, and 34 nonspecialist veterinarians were chosen by convenience sampling throughout the US to review medical records and apply the CDI during 2 pilot studies conducted in January and February 2021 (pilot 1) and May and June 2021 (pilot 2). We specified the following inclusion criteria for records: (1) contained within an electronic veterinary medical record system, (2) from a general veterinary practice, (3) dogs ≥ 8 years old, (4) documented ≥ 3 veterinary visits, and (5) most recently documented patient visit within 2 months prior to the study. The CDI was assessed through commercially available survey-generating instruments, and correlation analyses were performed. Results: Inter-rater κ statistics in the first pilot were poor, leading to clarifications and minor alterations to the CDI. Inter- and intrarater agreement for the second pilot indicated high diagnostic reliability. Conclusions: The CDI was validated as a tool for documenting multimorbidity in dogs. Clinical Relevance: The CDI will enable veterinarians to accurately and consistently document multimorbidity in diverse settings, which will enable the construction of multimorbidity tools. These tools can be used to predict the development of new morbidities in a multimorbid dog, anticipate the impact of new diagnoses on patient lifespan and quality of life, and plan for associated healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.