ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
A retroclival endodermal cyst mimicking an arachnoid cyst: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is important to differentiate arachnoid cysts from endodermal cysts in the posterior cranial fossa because they require different surgical treatments. Arachnoid cysts generally require fenestration. Meanwhile, in endodermal cysts, complete cyst resection is preferred to prevent recurrence. Despite the use of MRI and intraoperative findings, misdiagnosis can occur. Herein, the authors report a retroclival endodermal cyst that was initially suspected to be an arachnoid cyst based on pre- and intraoperative findings but was pathologically diagnosed as an endodermal cyst postoperatively. OBSERVATIONS: A 23-year-old female patient presented with a cystic lesion on the anterior brainstem. MRI showed that the cystic contents and CSF were similar in terms of signal. The cyst was suspected to be an arachnoid cyst. However, it continued to increase in size. Craniotomy and fenestration were performed, and the intraoperative findings were consistent with an arachnoid cyst. Therefore, intraoperative pathological examination was not performed, and the cyst wall was partially resected. The diagnosis of an endodermal cyst was confirmed via postoperative pathological examination. LESSONS: This case underscores the importance of considering endodermal cysts in the differential diagnosis of retroclival lesions even if the imaging and intraoperative findings are indicative of an arachnoid cyst. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24826.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.