ArticleRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina)2025
[Liberation of mechanical ventilation in tracheostomized pediatric patients during their stay in the intensive care unit]
Article in Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tracheostomy in pediatric intensive care has a prevalence between 5% and 10% of patients on mechanical ventilation. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the duration and outcome of the weaning process from mechanical ventilation (MV) and the behavior according to the reason for the tracheostomy. Methodology: Data from 59 patients under 18 years of age who received MV and underwent tracheostomy between January 2018 and March 2023 at the Juan P. Garrahan National Pediatric Hospital, Argentina, were retrospectively examined. Demographic variables, reasons for admission to the unit, days on MV, tracheostomy characteristics, and the weaning process from MV were recorded. Results: The main reasons for tracheostomy were airway disorders (50.8%) and prolonged MV (30.5%). Notable variability was observed in the duration and success of the weaning process among different groups of patients. Patients with airway disorders showed a faster weaning (median: 1.5 days) and higher success in this process, while those with prolonged MV and neurological disorders experienced longer processes (medians: 25.5 and 28 days, respectively) and more patients required partial or total mechanical ventilation at the end of this process. The presence of diaphragmatic dysfunction was more common in those who took longer to wean. Conclusion: The weaning from MV is a complex process, and the reason for the tracheostomy influences its progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.