ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Kolmogorov-Arnold networks for genomic tasks.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- unsurv: clustering individualized survival curves.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Kolmogorov-Arnold networks (KANs) emerged as a promising alternative for multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) in dense fully connected networks. Multiple attempts have been made to integrate KANs into various deep learning architectures in the domains of computer vision and natural language processing. Integrating KANs into deep learning models for genomic tasks has not been explored. Here, we tested linear KANs (LKANs) and convolutional KANs (CKANs) as a replacement for MLP in baseline deep learning architectures for classification and generation of genomic sequences. We used three genomic benchmark datasets: Genomic Benchmarks, Genome Understanding Evaluation, and Flipon Benchmark. We demonstrated that LKANs outperformed both baseline and CKANs on almost all datasets. CKANs can achieve comparable results but struggle with scaling over large number of parameters. Ablation analysis demonstrated that the number of KAN layers correlates with the model performance. Overall, linear KANs show promising results in improving the performance of deep learning models with relatively small number of parameters. Unleashing KAN potential in different state-of-the-art deep learning architectures currently used in genomics requires further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.