ReviewThe British journal of radiology2026
Radiology's role in providing and ensuring access to reproductive care.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The US Supreme Court Dobbs decision has significantly impacted reproductive healthcare in the United States. While obstetricians are most directly affected, radiologists, radiation oncologists, and medical imaging professionals are also involved in the care of pregnant patients, and these legislative changes can alter our practices. In this commentary, we describe examples of how this reproductive legal landscape has changed the practice of interventional radiology in states affected by abortion bans, discuss some of the radiologist lead advocacy efforts for the preservation of reproductive healthcare, and review the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound's first trimester ultrasound consensus statement clarifying and standardizing medical terminology frequently used in radiologist reports. The radiology community has a responsibility to advocate for the preservation of reproductive health and the patient-physician relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.