ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Marker selection strategies for circulating tumor DNA guided by phylogenetic inference.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationBlood-based profiling of tumor DNA ("liquid biopsy") offers great prospects for non-invasive early cancer diagnosis and clinical guidance, but requires further computational advances to become a robust quantitative assay of tumor clonal evolution. We propose new methods to better characterize tumor clonal dynamics from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), through application to two specific tasks: (i) applying longitudinal ctDNA data to refine phylogeny models of clonal evolution, and (ii) quantifying changes in clonal frequencies that may be indicative of treatment response or tumor progression. We pose these through a probabilistic framework for optimally identifying markers and using them to characterize clonal evolution.
resultsWe first estimate a density over clonal tree models using bootstrap samples over pre-treatment tissue-based sequence data. We then refine these models over successive longitudinal samples. We use the resulting framework for modeling and refining tree densities to pose a set of optimization problems for selecting ctDNA markers to maximize measures of utility for reducing uncertainty in phylogeny models and quantifying clonal frequencies given the models. We tested our methods on synthetic data and showed them to be effective at refining tree densities and inferring clonal frequencies. Application to real tumor data further demonstrated the methods' effectiveness in refining a lineage model and assessing its clonal frequencies. The work shows the power of computational methods to improve marker selection, clonal lineage reconstruction, and clonal dynamics profiling for more precise and quantitative assays of somatic evolution and tumor progression. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/CMUSchwartzLab/Mase-phi.git. (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14776163).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.