ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2025
Incorporation of patient-reported outcomes in pediatric cancer clinical trials: design, implementation, and dissemination.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Observational
- Patient-reported and caregiver-reported outcomes after limb salvage or amputation for pediatric bone and soft tissue sarcomas: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the patient experience of treatment toxicities and their impact on health-related quality of life from cancer treatments requires asking patients using patient-reported outcomes. Over the past 20 years, the National Institutes of Health has sponsored several tools-namely, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures and the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events-for precisely this purpose: to ensure valid, reliable tools to collect and detect patient-reported toxicities or adverse events and their impact on health-related quality of life. These patient-reported outcomes measures have been widely incorporated in clinical trials for adults with cancer. Yet, despite considerable work developing and validating developmentally appropriate versions of these measures for pediatric and adolescent self-report, patient-reported outcomes inclusion in pediatric and adolescent and young adult clinical trials has lagged. Here, we discuss optimal strategies to integrate validated patient-reported outcomes tools and sound analytic methodologies in clinical trials for children and adolescent and young adults with cancer, highlighting lessons learned from recent successes and ongoing experiences developing and opening cross-network trials for children and adolescent and young adults through the Children's Oncology Group for patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma, osteosarcoma, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.