Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40163689›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2025

Unmet need for previously untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a real-world study of patients diagnosed from 2011 to 2022 in the United States.

Kevin Punie, Allison W Kurian, Ioanna Ntalla, Nikoleta Sjekloca, Adina Estrin, Elizabeth C Dabrowski, Catherine Lai, Sara Hurvitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Pyrone Glucoside fromBiomolecules · 2026
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin PunieDepartment of Medical Oncology, Oncology Centre Antwerp, Ziekenhuis aan de Stroom, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1162-7963
Allison W KurianDepartments of Medicine and of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States.
Ioanna NtallaGilead Sciences Europe, LTD, Uxbridge, UB11 1AF, United Kingdom.
Nikoleta SjeklocaGilead Sciences Europe, LTD, Uxbridge, UB11 1AF, United Kingdom.
Adina EstrinAetion, Inc., New York, NY 10001, United States.
Elizabeth C DabrowskiAetion, Inc., New York, NY 10001, United States.
Catherine LaiGilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA 94404, United States.
Sara HurvitzClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center; Department of Medicine/Division of Hematology Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.

Funding

Gilead Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis real-world study describes the treatment landscape evolution after targeted therapy approval and associated survival outcomes for previously untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in the United States. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective analysis used de-identified electronic health record-derived data of patients diagnosed with mTNBC (January 2011-July 2022; index date was first-line [1L] treatment start date). Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, real-world overall survival (rwOS), and time to next treatment or death (TTNTD) were determined. Outcomes before (2011-2017, early cohort) and after (2018-2022, late cohort) targeted therapy approval were evaluated.

resultsAmong 2004 eligible patients, 21% were classified as Black, 13% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, and 63% were diagnosed with recurrent disease; median age was 60 years. First-line chemotherapy-only (single- and multiple-agent chemotherapy) use decreased with the introduction of targeted therapies from 96% before 2018 to 65% between 2019 and 2022. From 2019, 33% of patients received programmed death-(ligand) 1 inhibitor-based regimen; ~2% received poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Median 1L treatment duration was 2.6 months and this did not change over time. Of all 1L patients, 34% died before second-line (2L) and 51% subsequently received 2L treatment. Median (95% CI) 1L rwOS and TTNTD were 11.3 (10.7-12.0) months and 4.3 (4.1-4.6) months, respectively. Median 1L 5-year survival [95% CI] showed statistically significant but small improvement from the early (10.9 [10.3-11.6] months) to late cohort (11.9 [10.7-13.1] months; HR [95% CI], 0.87 [0.78-0.96]).

conclusionThis analysis demonstrated that, despite changes in care over time, survival improvements were not clinically meaningful; thus, a substantial unmet need for more efficacious treatments in previously untreated patients with mTNBC remains.

Indexed as

Triple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesUnited Statesfirst-linemetastaticreal-world clinical outcomestreatment patternstriple-negative breast cancerunmet need

Identifiers

PMID40163689
PMCPMC11957248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.