ArticleOphthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina2025
The Effect of Experience on Visual Search Patterns in Retinal Imaging Analysis.
Article in Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gaze Characteristics Using a Three-Dimensional Heads-Up Display During Cataract Surgery.Journal of eye movement research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe increasing use of retinal diagnostic imaging necessitates a standardized viewing technique. This study investigates visual search patterns among ophthalmologists at various experience levels using eye-tracking technology. PATIENTS AND
methodsParticipants included postgraduate year 2, 3, and 4 residents, retina fellows, and attending ophthalmologists, who analyzed fundus images while their eye movements were tracked.
resultsResults indicated that attendings had shorter fixation durations (0.15 ± 0.04 seconds) and saccade lengths (0.06° ± 0.01°), indicating faster image information processing than novice physicians. Experts also analyzed a higher proportion of the image area (49.43% ± 7.34%) and possessed a global-focal search pattern, suggesting increased thoroughness.
conclusionExperts in ophthalmology demonstrate gaze characteristics that reflect faster image processing and a more thorough analysis of diagnostic imaging. We recommend that residents be taught a standardized method for image interpretation that emulates expert analysis through a disc-macula-vessel-periphery sequence with radial sweeps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.