Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40163584›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026

Paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation enhances ballistic motor learning and corticospinal plasticity in older adults.

Jonas Rud Bjørndal, Lasse Jespersen, Mikkel Malling Beck, Anke Ninija Karabanov, Lasse Christiansen, Jesper Lundbye-Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonas Rud BjørndalMovement & Neuroscience, Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports (NEXS), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0710-7129
Lasse JespersenMovement & Neuroscience, Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports (NEXS), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5712-3795
Mikkel Malling BeckDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8006-2580
Anke Ninija KarabanovMovement & Neuroscience, Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports (NEXS), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1874-393X
Lasse ChristiansenDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9316-1529
Jesper Lundbye-JensenMovement & Neuroscience, Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports (NEXS), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3144-861X

Funding

Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond 0169-00027BKulturministeriet (Danish Ministry of Culture) FPK.2018-0070Lundbeck Foundation (Lundbeckfonden) R322-2019-2406Nordea-fonden (Nordea Foundation) 02-2019-00045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Late adulthood is accompanied by declines in manual motor performance and reduced neuroplasticity, which can influence the effects of motor practice and learning. Corticomotoneuronal (CM) connectivity can be targeted non-invasively through individualized paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS) to prime ballistic motor learning in young adults. However, the priming effects of PCMS on motor output and ballistic motor learning in older adults remain unexplored. Part one of this study investigates ballistic motor performance and learning in young (20-30 years) and older (65-75 years) adults as within-session changes in peak acceleration of rapid index finger flexions and delayed retention 1 week later. The results demonstrate that older adults display lower maximal acceleration compared to young adults and smaller improvements with practice, indicating inferior learning and low levels of delayed retention. Part two of the study investigates the effects of PCMS on motor learning and corticospinal excitability in older adults. Corticospinal excitability was assessed throughout the experiment by recording motor evoked potentials from the first dorsal interosseous. PCMS increased subsequent ballistic learning and corticospinal excitability after practice compared to SHAM. Importantly, combined PCMS and motor practice also enhanced long-term retention, and performance remained enhanced 7 days later. This means that PCMS effectively reinstated the otherwise absent long-term learning in older adults. We demonstrate that PCMS primes experience-dependent plasticity accompanying motor learning resulting in long-term benefits on motor performance in older adults. These findings highlight the potential of PCMS to enhance the effects of motor practice and benefit functional abilities in older adults. KEY POINTS: Late adulthood is associated with reduced activation of spinal motoneurons during vigorous movements, resulting in slower and less precise movements. Older adults (aged 65-75 years) display lower ballistic motor performance compared to younger adults (aged 20-30 years); furthermore, older adults exhibit smaller improvements during practice, and lower retention. A single session of paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS) increases corticospinal excitability and primes within-session ballistic motor learning in older adults. A single session of PCMS improves long-term retention following ballistic motor learning. We provide proof-of-principle that PCMS represents a potential strategy to enhance the effects of motor practice and counteract age-related decline in motor function.

Indexed as

LearningMotor NeuronsNeuronal PlasticityPyramidal TractsAdultAgedAgingEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultageingballistic motor learningcorticospinal excitabilitynon‐invasive neuromodulationpaired corticospinal‐motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS)transcranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40163584
PMCPMC12810219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.