ArticleDiabetes care2025
Community-Based Peer Support for Diabetes Management: 24-Month Changes Relative to Comparison Communities.
Article in Diabetes care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community-Based Models for Type 2 Diabetes Care: A Review of Effectiveness, Implementation, and Health System Integration.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Commentary on "The effects of self-compassion in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes: a pilot randomized controlled trial".Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2025Article
- Global spatiotemporal trends and influencing factors of type 2 diabetes mellitus mortality: estimates and predictions from 1990 to 2040.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Beyond glycemic control: a holistic perspective on psychosocial support in outpatient diabetes management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of community-based peer support for diabetes self-management with HbA1c and other clinical and psychosocial outcomes over 24 months. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThis study used an intervention comparison design with 12 intervention communities and 4 comparison communities matched according to location in urban or suburban areas. A community organization approach was used to integrate standardization of key messages and patient education protocols, along with adaptation and innovation among multiple community partners. The primary outcome was HbA1c; secondary outcomes included BMI, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), depressive symptoms (PHQ-8), diabetes distress, and general quality of life (EQ-5D).
resultsThe analyses included 967 participants completing both the baseline and follow-up assessment. Intervention communities versus comparison communities were older (mean age 66.43 vs. 63.45 years), included more women (57.1% vs. 45.5%), and had longer diabetes duration (mean 7.95 vs. 6.40 years). Significant improvements were found for HbA1c (7.42% [58 mmol/mol] vs. 7.95% [63 mmol/mol]), BMI (25.31 vs. 25.94 kg/m2), FPG (7.91 vs. 8.59 mmol/L), and depressive symptoms (PHQ-8 score 1.39 vs. 1.41), favoring intervention communities, after adjusting for baseline values of outcome measures and confounders (P ≤ 0.028). No interactions were found with age (<65 vs. ≥65 years). Men showed modestly greater diastolic blood pressure reduction, and women showed a minor increase of LDL-C in intervention communities. These analyses by age or sex and sensitivity analyses with missing data imputation supported the robustness of findings.
conclusionsCulturally adapted and appropriate community-based peer support for diabetes management may improve clinical and psychosocial outcomes at 24 months among people with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.