Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40163475›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

A mixed-method study of feasibility and acceptability of the Dapivirine vaginal ring among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in selected Zimbabwean districts.

Noah Taruberekera, Malvern Munjoma, Owen Mugurungi, Getrude Ncube, Miriam Mutseta, Munyaradzi Dhodho, Hanul Choi, Jabulani Mavudze, Tafara Moga, Blessing Mutede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Noah TaruberekeraPopulation Solutions for Health, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Malvern MunjomaPopulation Solutions for Health, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2232-4690
Owen MugurungiMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Getrude NcubeMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Miriam MutsetaMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Munyaradzi DhodhoPopulation Solutions for Health, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Hanul ChoiPopulation Solutions for Health, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2055-4740
Jabulani MavudzePopulation Solutions for Health, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6792-0526
Tafara MogaPopulation Solutions for Health, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Blessing MutedePopulation Solutions for Health, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2359-8948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Dapivirine vaginal ring (DPV-VR) is an intravaginal silicone ring that delivers an antiretroviral drug (Dapivirine) directly to vaginal tissues for 28 days. This ring protects women against HIV during the receptive vaginal sex at the site of potential infection. In 2021, the WHO recommended DPV as an additional prevention method for high-risk women for HIV with other approaches. With its discreet usage and disposal, DPV-VR has become a preferred HIV method among young women in Sub-Saharan Africa with a prevalent patriarchal social structure that prevents women from making decisions on their bodily autonomy. This study is aimed to assess the acceptability and feasibility of introducing DPV-VR as an HIV prevention method among young women in Zimbabwe and assess motivations and barriers of DPV-VR uptake among target population. We conducted an open-label prospective cohort study from 26 April 2022 to 23 January 2023 across 8 districts in Zimbabwe. Sexually active HIV-negative women aged between 18 and 25 years who were identified as high risk were offered a choice of oral PrEP or DPV-VR. Participants who chose DPV-VR were followed up for six months to receive monthly ring replacement and measure feasibility and acceptability. In-depth interviews were conducted with recipients of care who discontinued, continued for six months, or seroconverted while enrolled in the study to understand their experiences. A minimum of five clients who seroconverted were interviewed to identify potential timeline of seroconversions and risky behaviors. A total of 1,596 eligible participants were enrolled to study, and 1206 (76%) received DPV-VR and 390 AGYW opted for oral PrEP. Continuation rates were comparable among two groups at one month at 83% in the DPV ring arm and 84% in the oral PrEP arm. At 6 months, 64% of DPV users continued, compared to 16% in the oral PrEP arm. Participants who preferred to self-insert the ring increased from 50% at one-month follow up to 85.4% at 6 months. Seroconversion rates were comparable across two groups, as 9 out of 1095 (0.82%) DPV-VR users were seroconverted compared to 2 out of 390 (0.51%) oral PrEP users (p=0.608). Some DPV users mentioned pelvic pain and lower abdominal pain as common side effects. In in-depth interviews, participants mentioned motivators for DPV uptake such as its discreet use and not having to take medication daily. They also recommended to develop rings that last longer than current 28-day lifespan for women in rural areas or mobile who do not have continuous access to resources. This research provides evidence of DPV-VR as an acceptable and feasible HIV prevention in LMICs. Clients found it easy to insert the ring by themselves, and it provides a discreet way to protect themselves from HIV infection. Nevertheless, there are social barriers that hinder women's decision-making power in protecting their bodies. Therefore, it is recommended to conduct further studies to identify solutions for barriers and scale-up.

Identifiers

PMID40163475
PMCPMC11957275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.